Report by the Board of Directors

Financing risks

Global economic uncertainty may lead to payment delays, increase the risk for credit losses and weaken the availability and terms of financing. To fund its operations, EB relies mainly on income from its operative business and may from time to time seek additional financing from selected financial institutions. Currently EB has a committed overdraft credit facility agreement of EUR 10 million and committed revolving credit facility agreement of EUR 10 million, valid until June 30, 2014. These agreements include financial covenants related to groupīs equity ratio and earnings before interest and taxes (EBITDA), to be reviewed semiannually. There is no assurance that additional financing will not be needed in case of clearly weaker than expected development of EBīs businesses or in case customer commitments of the Automotive Business Segment would represent more than planned funding for R&D phase.

Customer dependency in some parts of EBīs business may translate as accumulation of risk with respect to outstanding receivables and ultimately with respect to credit losses. EB asserted claims for its receivables in the amount of approximately USD 25.8 million (EUR 18.8 million as per exchange rate of February 19, 2014) in the Chapter 11 cases of its customers Terre- Star Networks Inc. and its parent company TerreStar Corporation filed in 2010 and 2011. In addition to the booked receivables, EB asserted claims for additional costs in the amount of approximately USD 2.1 million (EUR 1.5 million as per exchange rate of February 19, 2014) resulting mainly from the ramp down of the business operations between the parties. Thus, EB asserted claims against each of the TerreStar entities in amounts totaling USD 27.9 million (EUR 20.3 million as per exchange rate of February 19, 2014). Due to uncertainties related to the accounts receivable, EB booked an impairment of the accounts receivable in the amount of EUR 8.3 million during the second half of 2010.

By order of the bankruptcy court dated August 24, 2012, Elektrobit Inc., a subsidiary of EB, and TerreStar Corporation and certain of its preferred shareholders, entered into a full and final settlement of various disputes that had arisen between them in the TerreStar Corporation reorganization cases. Pursuant to this settlement, on August 28, 2012 TerreStar Corporation made a cash payment to Elektrobit Inc. of USD 13.5 million in full and final satisfaction of EBīs claim against that entity. The settlement did not include the TerreStar Networks Chapter 11 cases and did not include any distribution from those cases that may be available to EB. On October 24, 2012, the bankruptcy court entered an order approving a plan of reorganization for TerreStar Corporation and various affiliates (not including TerreStar Networks) which preserved EBīs rights with respect to EBīs claim against TerreStar Networks.

As to TerreStar Networks, EB presently estimates that its total distribution under the TerreStar Networks confirmed plan of liquidation may be approximately 8% of the face amount of its claim. However, this estimate is subject to various assumptions, and the amount and timing of EBīs distribution on the remaining portion of its claim cannot be predicted with certainty at this time. Pursuant to the plan, on March 29, 2012 EB received a USD 650,890 distribution on that portion of its claim entitled to payment priority under U.S. bankruptcy law.

As part of the Chapter 11 process, the liquidating trustee (the “Trusteeī) of The Terre- Star Networks Inc. Liquidating Trust (the trust having been formed in connection with confirmation of the Chapter 11 plan of TerreStar Networks) is considering whether the Trustee may recover payments previously made to creditors pursuant to various provisions of the Bankruptcy Code. During the 90 days prior to TerreStar Networksī bankruptcy filing, EB received approximately USD 2.5 million that the Trustee has alleged to be preferential payments, and it remains possible that the Trustee may sue EB to recover these payments. EB believes that it has strong defenses to any such litigation and therefore would vigorously contest it, but anticipates that this issue must be adjudicated or settled before EB receives further distributions on its claim. Further, in reconciling accounts in preparation for making distributions under the TerreStar Networks plan, the Trustee requested, and EB provided, additional information and documents in support of EBīs claim. EB has entered into a tolling agreement with the Trustee which, as amended, extends the avoidance action statute of limitations through and including April 18, 2014, which date could be further extended by mutual consent, with a view to determining whether the parties can settle any outstanding disputes between them. The likelihood and outcome of any such disputes cannot be predicted with certainty at this time.

Based on EBīs current understanding, there is no reason to believe that EB would not be able to collect from the bankruptcy estate of TerreStar Networks the full amount (or close to it) of the pro rata distribution on its general unsecured claim in due course. It is possible that based on later information related to the TerreStar Networks Chapter 11 cases, the above views may need to be reconsidered. Should the amount of the pro rata distribution on EBīs general unsecured claim not be collected from the bankruptcy estate of TerreStar Networks, and should the Trustee commence litigation resulting an order for EB to repay certain allegedly preferential transfers, costs related to the process would additionally lower EBīs operating result on a non-recurring basis by approximately EUR 2 million at maximum.

The U.S. Internal Revenue Service (“IRSī) disallowed a deduction taken on EBīs subsidiaryīs, Elektrobit Inc.īs 2010 U.S. federal income tax return for the impairment of the receivables from the TerreStar companies. EB appealed this disallowance to the IRS Office of Appeals, which is expected to render a decision before the end of the third quarter of 2014. An unfavorable decision can be appealed to the United States Tax Court, in which case the appeal may take two years.

If the appeal were to proceed to the United States Tax Court and if the resolution of the litigation results in a complete rejection of the amount deducted in 2010, EB would be required to pay back the tax refund in full with accrued interest. At worst, as a result of the pay back of the tax refund and the respective interest expenses and litigation expenses, there would be a negative effect on EBīs cash flow of approximately USD 2.7 million (EUR 2.0 million as per exchange rate of February 19, 2014). Depending on the progression of the appellate process, such effects would be booked probably in 2016. Based on EBīs current understanding, there is no reason to believe that the IRSī disallowance will be sustained. Based on subsequent information, the situation may need to be reconsidered. It is also possible that during the appellate process, the parties may settle this matter.

More information on TerreStar Networks Inc.īs and its parent company TerreStar Corporationīs reorganization cases are presented in the October 20 and 25, November 20 and December 30, 2010, February 17, 2011, November 18, 2011, June 21, 2012, August 3, 2012, August 24, 2012 and August 28, 2012 stock exchange releases as well as in EBīs interim reports and financial statements at